Affiliation:
1. George Mason University
Abstract
The use of numerical/quantitative data in qualitative research studies and reports has been controversial. Prominent qualitative researchers such as Howard Becker and Martyn Hammersley have supported the inclusion of what Becker called “quasi-statistics”: simple counts of things to make statements such as “some,” “usually,” and “most” more precise. However, others have resisted such uses, particularly when they are requested by reviewers for journals. This paper presents both the advantages of integrating quantitative information in qualitative data collection, analysis, and reporting, and the potential problems created by such uses and how these can be dealt with. It also addresses the definition of mixed methods research, arguing that the use of numbers by itself doesn't make a study “mixed methods.”
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Anthropology
Reference57 articles.
1. The Book of Evidence
2. Meeting the Universe Halfway
3. Becker, H.S. ( 1970). Field work evidence. In H. Becker , Sociological work: Method and substance (pp. 39-62). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
4. Becker, H.S. ( 1990). Generalizing from case studies. In E. Eisner & A Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 233-242.) New York: Teachers College Press.
Cited by
561 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献