A single centre prospective cohort study addressing the effect of a rule-in/rule-out troponin algorithm on routine clinical practice

Author:

Marjot Jack1,Kaier Thomas E1,Henderson Katherine2,Hunter Laura2,Marber Michael S1,Perera Divaka1

Affiliation:

1. King’s College London BHF Centre, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK

2. Emergency Department, St Thomas’ Hospital London, UK

Abstract

Aims: In 2015, the European Society of Cardiology introduced new guidelines for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. These guidelines included the use of high-sensitivity troponin assays for ‘rule-in’ and ‘rule-out’ of acute myocardial injury at presentation (using a ‘0 hour’ blood test). Whilst these algorithms have been extensively validated in prospective diagnostic studies, the outcome of their implementation in routine clinical practice has not been described. The present study describes the change in the patient journey resulting from implementation of such an algorithm in a busy innercity Emergency Department. Methods and results: Data were prospectively collected from electronic records at a large Central London hospital over seven months spanning the periods before, during and after the introduction of a new high-sensitivity troponin rapid diagnostic algorithm modelled on the European Society of Cardiology guideline. Over 213 days, 4644 patients had high-sensitivity troponin T measured in the Emergency Department. Of these patients, 40.4% could be ‘ruled-out’ based on the high-sensitivity troponin T concentration at presentation, whilst 7.6% could be ‘ruled-in’. Adoption of the algorithm into clinical practice was associated with a 37.5% increase of repeat high-sensitivity troponin T measurements within 1.5 h for those patients classified as ‘intermediate risk’ on presentation. Conclusions: Introduction of a 0 hour ‘rule-in’ and ‘rule-out’ algorithm in routine clinical practice enables rapid triage of 48% of patients, and is associated with more rapid repeat testing in intermediate risk patients.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3