Risk assessment for infected endocarditis in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia patients: When is transesophageal echocardiography needed?

Author:

Longobardo Luca1,Klemm Sarah23,Cook Margaret23,Ravenna Valerie4,Brummitt Charles F235,Mengesha Tadele6,Khandheria Bijoy K57

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine – Section of Cardiology, University of Messina, Italy

2. Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Center, Milwaukee, USA

3. Antibiotic Stewardship Program, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, USA

4. Medical Science Liaison, Theravance Biopharma, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA

5. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Milwaukee, USA

6. Aurora Research Institute, Milwaukee, USA

7. Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers, Milwaukee, WI, USA

Abstract

Aims: Echocardiography is the main technique for the diagnosis of endocarditis in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), but a consensus about performing transthoracic echocardiography or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as first-line tests is currently lacking. Recently, a new scoring system has been proposed by Palraj et al. to guide the use of TEE in this population. Our aim was to validate this scoring system or modify it, if necessary. Methods and results: Data from SAB patients admitted from 2012 to 2014 were collected. We tested the Palraj scores to stratify patients’ risk for endocarditis. Moreover, we analyzed our population to identify any other possible clinical predictors of endocarditis not included in the score. Endocarditis was diagnosed in 38 of 205 patients (18.5%). Palraj’s score was effective in the detection of patients at high risk of endocarditis. In addition, we identified the presence of cardiac devices, prolonged bacteremia and intravenous drug abuse (IVDA) as elements strongly correlated with endocarditis. Two scoring systems (Day-1 and Day-5) were derived including IVDA as a variable. Using a Day-1 cut-off value ≥5 and a Day-5 cut-off value ≥2, the ‘modified Palraj’s score’ showed sensitivities of 42.1% and 97.0% and specificities of 88.6% and 32.0% for Day-1 and Day-5 scores, respectively. Conclusion: We modify and expand upon an effective scoring system to identify SAB patients at high risk for endocarditis in order to guide use of TEE. The inclusion of IVDA in the criteria for the calculation of the scores improves its effectiveness.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3