Teaching Research in Principle and in Practice: What Do Psychology Instructors Think of Research Projects in Their Courses?

Author:

Wagge Jordan R.1ORCID,Hurst Michelle A.2ORCID,Brandt Mark J.3,Lazarevic Ljiljana B.4ORCID,Legate Nicole5,Grahe Jon E.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Avila University, USA

2. University of Chicago, USA

3. Michigan State University, USA

4. University of Belgrade, Serbia

5. Illinois Institute of Technology, USA

6. Pacific Lutheran University, USA

Abstract

Psychology majors typically conduct at least one research project during their undergraduate studies, yet these projects rarely make a scientific contribution beyond the classroom. In this study, we explored one potential reason for this—that student projects may not be aligned with best practices in the field. In other words, we wondered if there was a mismatch between what instructors teach in principle and what student projects are in practice. To answer this, we asked psychology instructors ( n = 111) who regularly teach courses involving research projects questions about these projects. Instructors endorsed many of the commonly assumed pitfalls of student projects, such as not using rigorous methodology. Notably, the characteristics of these typical student projects did not align with the qualities instructors reported as being important in research practice. We highlight opportunities to align these qualities by employing resources such as crowdsourced projects specifically developed for student researchers.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology,Education

Reference30 articles.

1. American Psychological Association (2012). APA Guidelines for the undergraduate psychology Major, guidelines 2.0. Retrieved From: https://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/about/psymajor-guidelines.pdf

2. Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences Can Make Scientific Research More Inclusive

3. What Crowdsourcing Can Offer to Cross-Cultural Psychological Science

4. Teaching Replication

5. Reexamining the Effect of Gustatory Disgust on Moral Judgment: A Multilab Direct Replication of Eskine, Kacinik, and Prinz (2011)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3