Systematic Reviews of Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Reviews in Healthcare Research: How to Assess the Methodological Quality of Included Reviews?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Systematic Reviews of Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Reviews in Healthcare Research: How to Assess the Methodological Quality of Included Reviews?

Published:2021-12-03 Issue: Volume: Page:155868982110542
ISSN:1558-6898
Container-title:Journal of Mixed Methods Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Author:

Rouleau Geneviève¹^ORCID,Hong Quan Nha²,Kaur Navdeep³,Gagnon Marie‐Pierre⁴⁵,Côté José¹⁶,Bouix-Picasso Julien⁶⁷⁸^ORCID,Pluye Pierre⁹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research Chair in Innovative Nursing Practices, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada

2. School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

3. Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada

4. The Canada Research Chair on Technologies and Practices in Health, Faculty of Nursing, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada

5. Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Axis, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Quebec, QC, Canada

6. Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

7. Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratoire Educations et Promotion en Santé, LEPS, UR 3412, F-93430, Villetaneuse, France

8. Val-de-Grâce Military Academy, Training department for non-medical personnel, French Military Health Service, Paris, France

9. Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

Abstract

Conducting a review of systematic reviews can be challenging, especially when combining systematic quantitative, qualitative and mixed studies reviews. In this methodological discussion paper, we propose (a) a typology for categorizing various types of review of reviews and (b) an exploration of criteria pertaining to three existing critical appraisal tools (ROBIS, AMSTAR 2, and MMSR) to identify those that could be adapted for qualitative and mixed studies reviews. Further work has to be done to develop methodological guidance in conducting, interpreting, and reporting reviews of reviews that combine qualitative and quantitative data.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Education

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/15586898211054243

Reference56 articles.

1. The Causal Devolution

2. Summarizing systematic reviews

3. Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four-item checklist

4. Introduction

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pedagogical strategies to improve emotional competencies in nursing students: A systematic review;Nurse Education Today;2024-11

2. Teledentistry for improving access to, and quality of oral health care: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses;PLOS ONE;2024-01-02

3. Teledentistry for improving access to, and quality of oral health care: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses;2023-07-05

4. The Delivery of Person-Centered Care for People Living With Dementia in Residential Aged Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis;The Gerontologist;2023-05-05

5. Types and associated methodologies of overviews of reviews in health care: a methodological study with published examples;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2023-01