Mind the gap: Bridging evidence-based witness identification procedures to practice through police training

Author:

Cecconello William Weber1ORCID,Fitzgerald Ryan J.2,Milne Rebecca3ORCID,Stein Lilian Milnitsky4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Atitus Educação, Brazil

2. Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Canada

3. Institute of Criminal Justice Studies, University of Portsmouth, UK

4. Professional Graduate Program in Law, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil

Abstract

Research has led to evidence-based eyewitness identification procedures, but empirical research on how to train police officers in such techniques is limited. We tested the effectiveness of the FAIR (Find a suspect, Avoiding bias, Instructing the witness, Record the procedure) eyewitness identification training program with 88 Brazilian police officers. The hypothesis that FAIR training would improve identification procedures was supported by pre- and post-training assessment of performance on a lineup construction task. Training increased the likelihood that police officers would construct lineups with known-innocent fillers and provide recommended pre-lineup instructions to witnesses (e.g., stating that the witness is not required to make an identification). Training also decreased non-recommended lineup practices, such as revealing the identity of the main suspect after a witness response. Feedback from the participants supports the conclusion that FAIR training improved knowledge of how to build lineups, instruct witnesses, and avoid undesirable and potentially biasing practices. Nevertheless, participants anticipated that incorporating the reform procedures into practice would provoke resistance from superiors and colleagues, which highlights the need for FAIR training to be supported by infrastructure, resources and policy that enable police officers to use evidence-based procedures in eyewitness identification.

Funder

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law

Reference32 articles.

1. Technical Working Group on Eyewitness Evidence (1999). Eyewitness evidence: a guide to for law enforcement.

2. National Institute of Justice Technical Working Group on Eyewitness Evidence.

3. Assessing the efficacy of investigative interviewing training courses: A systematic review

4. Brasil. (1941) Decreto-lei no 3.689, de 3 de outubro de 1941. Aprova o Código de Processo Penal [Penal Code of Brazil].

5. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3