Rights and freedoms during covert investigations: Balance between security and personal freedoms

Author:

Babikov Oleksandr1ORCID,Svintsytskyi Andrii V2,Nazarov Viktor V3,Kosilova Olha I4,Bozhyk Valerii5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Criminal Law and Procedure, Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine

2. Ukrainian Scientific and Research Institute of Special Equipment and Forensic Expertise of the Security Service of Ukraine, Ukraine; Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, University of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine, Ukraine

3. Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics, Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine, Ukraine

4. Research Department, Institute of Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine

5. Prince Volodymyr the Great Educational and Scientific Institute of Law, Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, Ukraine

Abstract

The aim of this article is to determine and assess the feasibility of using covert investigations against special entities, identifying the risks of unwarranted interference in a person’s private life during application of these investigations, and developing general principles of covert investigation to observe fundamental human rights and freedoms. These requirements are enshrined in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine, European Union legislation and the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). To achieve this research aim, a range of methods was used. A comparative method was used to analyse the international and domestic legislation of Ukraine and other states; a dogmatic method was applied to study the legal positions of the ECtHR on covert investigations; a dialectical method helped to establish the principles of additional guarantees for special subjects; and the general principles of ensuring the rights and freedoms of special entities during covert investigations were analysed. As a result, it is suggested that Ukrainian legislation regarding covert investigations against special entities should be amended and criteria for lawful and unlawful interference in personal communications be introduced.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference40 articles.

1. Babikov OP (2021) “Expediency and threats of the use of covert measures to obtain information”: materials of the international scientific-practical conference “Current issues of legal science and practice in the 21st century” Pravo: Rivne, September 23–24, 2021.

2. Constitution of Ukraine (1996) Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр#Text.

3. Council of Europe (1950) Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf, April 14, 2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3