Affiliation:
1. Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Abstract
The Supreme Court's decision in NCAA v. Alston already has had profound effects on the governance of college sports. Despite the narrow scope of the relief ordered in Alston, the opinion invites more challenges to NCAA rules that restrict compensation of athletes. Within months after Alston was decided, many athletes already are substantially better off financially, and the NCAA has delegated regulation of compensation of athletes to its conferences and divisions. Moreover, the case represents an intellectual victory for sports economics in that decades of research in the field formed the foundation for the Court's opinion.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference27 articles.
1. Oldies but Goldies! Twenty Years After, the Journal of Sports Economics at a Crossroads?
2. Research Note: Estimates of College Football Player Rents
3. Casper M. (2017, February). NCAA and conferences agree to $208.7 million settlement in antitrust suit. Jurist. https://www.jurist.org/news/2017/02/ncaa-and-conferences-agree-to-2087-million-settlement-in-antitrust-suit/
4. Charboneau M. (2021, September 8). Mat Ishbia’s UWM pledges $500 per month to 133 MSU athletes; why not females, critics ask. Detroit News. https://www.detroitnews.com/story/sports/college/michigan-state-university/2021/09/08/mat-ishbias-uwm-sponsor-133-msu-athletes-500-per-month/5768599001/
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献