Development and implementation of the lung volume reduction pulmonary rehabilitation tool to identify eligibility for lung volume reduction in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during pulmonary rehabilitation

Author:

Buttery Sara C12ORCID,Williams Parris J12ORCID,Brighton Lisa J34ORCID,Batista Craig5,Dewar Amy5,Hogg Lauren6,Ingram Karen2,Korff Gemma2,Koulopoulou Maria7,Lammin Helen2,Maddocks Matthew3,McDonnell Lynn6,Mehta Bhavin2,Meyrick Victoria7,Pritchard Lisa6,Smith Oliver2,Trivedi Puja2,Lawson Rod A8,Hopkinson Nicholas S12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. NHLI, Airways Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK

2. Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Clinical Group of Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

3. Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK

4. Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK

5. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

6. Department of Physiotherapy, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London UK

7. Department of Intergrated Respiratory Care, King’s College Hospital, London, UK

8. Respiratory and General Internal Medicine, Sheffield Teachning Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK

Abstract

Background Completion of pulmonary rehabilitation is recognised in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guidelines as a key opportunity to consider systematically whether a respiratory review to assess potential suitability for a lung volume reduction (LVR) procedure might be appropriate. We describe the development of a simple decision-support tool (the LVR-PR tool) to aid clinicians working in pulmonary rehabilitation, to operationalise this process. Methods We took an iterative mixed methods approach, which was partnership-based and involved an initial consensus survey, focus groups and an observational study cohort at multiple pulmonary rehabilitation centres. Results Diagnosis (97%), exercise capacity (84%), breathlessness (78%) and co-morbidities (76%) were acknowledged to be essential items for assessing basic LVR eligibility. Collating prior investigations and assessing patient understanding were considered useful but not essential. Clinician concerns included; streamlining the tool; access to clinical information and investigations; and care needed around introducing LVR therapies to patients in a PR setting. Access to clearer information about LVR procedures, the clinician’s role in considering eligibility and how educational resources should be delivered were identified as important themes from patient group discussions. The LVR-PR tool was considered to be feasible and valid for implementation in a variety of PR services across the UK subject to the provision of appropriate health professional training. Clinicians working in specialist LVR centres across the UK who were not otherwise involved in the development process confirmed the tool’s validity using the content validity index (CVI). Interpretation The LVR-PR tool appears to be an acceptable tool that can be feasibly implemented in PR services subject to good quality educational resources for both patients and healthcare professionals.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme

ESRC Post-Doctoral Fellowship

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3