Affiliation:
1. Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Abstract
In this article, we used a novel hybrid approach to review literature concerned with family and domestic violence (FADV) perpetrators. Our intention was to chart the research and publication activity of authors with Australian affiliation to identify homegrown evidence related to stopping the perpetration of violence. This involved systematic searching of literature from the Scopus electronic database, utilization of VOSviewer to sort keyword co-occurrences and authorship linking for 1,494 publication records over a 30-year period, and the review of 21 articles with perpetrator focus, identified from the 50 most cited publications. We found that Australians’ authoring interests in FADV, over the last three decades, with perpetrator focus were predominantly concentrated on gender, rape and sexual assault, coercive control, and child abuse. In the most cited literature, six major themes were identified: perpetrator motivations, perpetrator interventions, patterns of violence, pandemic duet, perception of blame, and cyberstalking and violence. An upward curve in Australian authoring activity in the period under review aligns with societal shifts in which FADV was once considered a private issue and has now become ubiquitous in the public domain. Our findings revealed that research into perpetrators is insufficient to promote a zero-tolerance approach to FADV. Our corresponding in-depth literature review provides valuable insights surrounding perpetrator intervention programs with the goal of more effectively addressing the emerging challenge of technology-facilitated coercive control.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Applied Psychology,Health (social science)
Reference55 articles.
1. AIHW. (2022). Family, domestic and sexual violence. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Retrieved April 9, 2022, from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/behaviours-risk-factors/domestic-violence/glossary
2. Ali P., Allmark P., Booth A., Seedat F., Woods H. B., McGarry J. (2021). How accurate and useful are published UK prevalence rates of intimate partner violence (IPV)? Rapid review and methodological commentary. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 11(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-11-2020-0048
3. Arias E., Arce R., Vilariño M. (2013). Batterer intervention programmes: A meta-analytic review of effectiveness. Psychosocial Intervention, 22(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.5093/in2013a18
4. Basilio M. P., Pereira V., de Oliveira M. W. C. M., da Costa Neto A. F., Moraes O. C. R., Siqueira S. C. B. (2021). Knowledge discovery in research on domestic violence: An overview of the last fifty years. Data Technologies and Applications, 55(4), 480–510. https://doi.org/10.1108/DTA-08-2020-0179
5. Bates E. A., Graham-Kevan N., Bolam L. T., Thornton A. J. (2017). A review of domestic violence perpetrator programs in the United Kingdom. Partner Abuse, 8(1), 3–46. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.8.1.3