Abstract
This article considers the theory and practice of accountability arrangements for quangos in the UK. Theoretical notions of accountability are discussed and the practice of parliamentary accountability evaluated in the context of the traditional notion of ministerial responsibility. The study outlines the results obtained through an empirical analysis of parliamentary questions, M.P.s’ replies to a questionnaire and several interviews with M.P.s. The analysis suggests that ministerial oversight over these bodies is more extensive than scholars have traditionally assumed. In addition, the study draws attention to the role of members’ constituencies in raising concerns about quangos and the extent to which M.P.s collaborate with quangos rather than scrutinise their activities.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献