Management of urolithiasis in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Salehi-Pourmehr Hanieh1,Tayebi Sona2,DalirAkbari Nooriyeh3,Ghabousian Amir1,Tahmasbi Fateme1,Rahmati Fatemeh1,Naseri Amirreza4,Hajebrahimi Reyhaneh5,Mehdipour Robab1,Hemmati-Ghavshough Mahdi1,Mostafaei Ali6,Hajebrahimi Sakineh7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Iranian EBM Centre: A Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Center of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

2. Urology Department, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahwaz, Iran

3. Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

4. Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

5. Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Iranian EBM Centre: A Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Center of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IranStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

6. Research Center for Evidence-Based-Medicine Faculty of Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Azadi Street Golgasht Avenue Tabriz 5166/15731 East Azarbaijan Iran

7. Professor of Urology Research Center for Evidence-Based-Medicine Faculty of Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Azadi Street Golgasht Avenue Tabriz 5166/1573 East Azarbaijan Iran

Abstract

Purpose: Management of nephrolithiasis is unique in pregnancy and requires multidisciplinary care. To identify the effectiveness or safety of temporary drainage or definitive treatment methods to manage urolithiasis in pregnancy. Methods: The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies was conducted in August 2021. Studies published in any language on any date were considered for inclusion. Results: Of a total of 3349 publications, 36 studies were included in our qualitative evaluation and 32 studies in the quantitative synthesis. The commonly reported method was stent insertion ( n = 29 studies), pneumatic ( n = 12), laser ( n = 9) lithotripsy, and stone removal using any devices (basket, grasper, or forceps) ( n = 11). In seven studies, the authors reported the outcomes of conservative management, and the results showed that the stone-free rate is 54%, and symptom relief occurred in 62% of women. Seven eligible studies reported that 79.9% of urolithiasis were expulsed through stent insertion, while this rate was 94.6% among percutaneous nephrostomy use in two included studies, 88.5% for pneumatic lithotripsy ( n = 7 studies), and 76.4% for laser lithotripsy ( n = 4 studies), or 95.4% for stone removal method. In addition, adverse events were reported in less than 10% of pregnant women. Conclusions: The results showed that stent, pneumatic or laser lithotripsy, and ureteroscopic stone removal were the commonest used methods in the included studies. They can be effective and safe treatment approaches without major maternal or neonatal complications, and could be introduced as an effective and safe therapeutic method for urolithiasis during pregnancy. However, most of the included studies had moderate quality according to critical appraisal checklists. Further prospective studies are needed to reach a conclusion.

Funder

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3