The cardioprotective effects of adenosine-induced cardioplegic arrest versus saline in aortic valve replacement patients: A randomized controlled trial

Author:

Mattila Mikko S.1ORCID,Järvelä Kati M.234,Rantanen Markku J.24,Tuohinen Suvi5,Nikus Kjell C.234,Laurikka Jari O.234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Heart Hospital Tampere University Hospital Tays Sydänkeskus Oy PL 2000 33521 Tampere Finland Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology Tampere University Tampere Finland The Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa Tampere Finland

2. Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland

3. Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

4. The Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, Finland

5. Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, HUS, Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

Background and aims: Adenosine is a widely used potent cardioprotective drug, but the effect of an adenosine bolus in initial cardioplegia on cardioprotection in aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients has not been demonstrated. The aim of this double-blind randomized clinical trial was to compare intra-aortic adenosine bolus with saline on the postoperative myocardial function in patients undergoing AVR. Methods: Aortic valve stenosis patients scheduled for elective or urgent AVR surgery were randomized to receive either a 20 mg (4 mL) single dose of adenosine or a saline into the ascending aorta during the first cardioplegia infusion. The primary outcome was cardiac index (CI (L/min/m2) at four timepoints (before incision, after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), at 7 p.m. on the operation day, and at 6 a.m. the next morning). Secondary outcomes included left ventricular stroke work index, right ventricular stroke work index, and myocardial biomarkers at the same timepoints. Results: Between November 2015 and March 2018, 45 patients were recruited, 23 in the adenosine group and 22 in the placebo group. The last follow-up date was 17 March 2018. There were no statistically significant differences in CI (mean differences with 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.09 L/min/m2 at baseline (−0.20 to 0.38), −1.39 L/min/m2 (−3.47 to 0.70) at post-CPB, −0.39 L/min/m2 (−0.78 to 0.004) at 7 p.m., and −0.32 L/min/m2 (−0.68 to 0.05) at 6 a.m., ( p = 0.066)), right ventricular stroke work index, ( p = 0.24), or cardiac biomarkers between the groups. Left ventricular stroke work index was lower in the adenosine group (−3.66 gm/m2 (−11.13 to 3.81) at baseline, −17.42 gm/m2 (−37.81 to 2.98) at post-CPB, −3.36 gm/m2 (−11.10 to 4.38) at 7 p.m., and −3.77 gm/m2 (−10.19 to 2.66) at 6 a.m. ( p = 0.021)). Conclusions: There were no differences between 20 mg adenosine bolus and saline in the first cardioplegia infusion in CI improvement in AVR surgery for aortic valve stenosis. EudraCT number: 2014-001382-26.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3