Preoperative Predictors for Good Postoperative Satisfaction and Functional Outcome in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery — A Prospective Observational Study with a Two-Year Follow-up

Author:

Aalto T.1,Sinikallio S.2,Kröger H.3,Viinamäki H.4,Herno A.5,Leinonen V.6,Turunen V.7,Savolainen S.6,Airaksinen O.5

Affiliation:

1. Kyyhkylä Rehabilitation Center and Hospital, Mikkeli, Finland

2. Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland

3. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kuopio University Hospital and Bone Cartilage Research Unit, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland

4. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Psychiatry. University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland

5. Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland

6. Department of Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland

7. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland

Abstract

Background and Aims: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most frequent indication for back surgery in adults aged over 65 years, but about one-third of operated patients have less than good/excellent results from the operation. Awareness of outcome predictors and their predictive values may help clinicians in their assessment of the prognosis of patients when considering surgical treatment. Our aim was to study the preoperative predictors in LSS for a good postoperative outcome (satisfaction with surgery and functional improvement) with a two-year follow-up. Material and Methods: LSS patients (n = 102) completed a questionnaire preoperatively and on two-year follow-up. Preoperative patient-related predictors, self-rated health, comorbidities and preoperative treatment were assessed. Satisfaction with the surgical outcome was assessed with a seven-category scale; satisfaction was determined to be good if the patient response was “condition has considerably improved” or “totally cured”. Other responses (“condition has slightly improved” or worse) represented poorer satisfaction. A good functional outcome was determined as > 30% relative improvement compared to the presurgery score in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: The predictors for good satisfaction were age < 75 years at operation (OR 4.03; 95% CI 1.35–12.02; p = 0.012) and no previous lumbar operation (OR 3.65; 95% CI 1.13–11.79; p = 0.031). Predictors for a good improvement in the ODI score were regular preoperative analgesic use < 12 months (OR 3.40; 95% CI 1.21–9.53; p = 0.020), non-smoking (OR 3.47; 95% CI 1.09–11.03; p = 0.035) and good (above average) self-rated health (OR 3.27; 95% CI 1.06–10.12; p = 0.039). Conclusions: In LSS, regular analgesic treatment preoperatively for 12 months or less, self-rated health above average and non-smoking predicted a good postoperative functional improvement. An age under 75 years and no previous lumbar operation predicted good postoperative satisfaction with the surgery.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3