Staging of Rectal Carcinoma with Transrectal Ultrasonography

Author:

Nesbakken A.1,Løvig T.1,Lunde O. C.1,Nygaard K.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Aker University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Background and Aims: Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) has proven useful for loco-regional staging of rectal carcinoma in specialised centres, but the investigation is not widely used. The aim of this study was to audit the introduction of TRUS performed by surgeons without previous experience with ultrasonography. Material and Methods: All patients admitted with rectal carcinoma in the period 1996–2002 entered this prospective, comparative study. TRUS with a stiff endorectal probe was performed preoperatively in 118 consecutive patients, 91 of whom subsequently had rectal resection without preoperative radiotherapy (PRT), and seven who had rectal resection after PRT. Twenty patients did not have resection. The main outcome measures was the feasibility of TRUS in staging of rectal cancer, and the accuracy of T- and N-staging, comparing TRUS with the histopathological examination of resected specimens. Results: TRUS was successful in 81/91 patients who underwent rectal resection without PRT. The accuracy of T-staging was 74 % overall; 40 % in five pT1 tumours, 81 % in 26 pT2 tumours, 80 % in 45 pT3 tumours and 25 % in four pT4-tumours. With regard to perirectal tissue invasion, the sensitivity and specificity of TRUS was 82 % and 84 %, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 89 and 71 %, respectively. The accuracy of TRUS for N-staging was 65 %. The sensitivity for detection of lymph node metastases was 41 % and the specificity 68 %. TRUS was unsuccessful in 21/118 patients, in 12/98 who had rectal resection, and in 9/20 who did not have resection, because of stenosis or high location of the tumour precluding correct placing of the probe. Conclusions: TRUS is often unsuccessful in patients with advanced tumours, especially when the tumour is located in the upper rectum. The predictive values for perirectal tumour invasion were acceptable, but the sensitivity for detection of lymph node metastases was low. These results were obtained by surgeons without previous experience with ultrasonographic examinations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3