Not a Problem at All or Excluded by Oneself, Doctors and the Law? Healthcare Workers’ Perspectives on Access to HIV-Related Healthcare among Same-Sex Attracted Men in Tanzania

Author:

Mwijage Ishungisa Alexander1ORCID,Meyrowitsch Dan Wolf2,Mmbaga Elia John13,Leshabari Melkizedeck Thomas1,Moen Kåre3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Behavioural Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics of the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

2. Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark

3. Department of Community Medicine and Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Background: An increasing body of literature focuses on access to healthcare services for men who engage in sex with other men in Africa, but how healthcare workers conceive of this topic of healthcare workers’ views on men's care has not been much studied. Drawing on qualitative research, this article explores healthcare providers’ perspectives on access to HIV-related healthcare services among gender and sexuality diverse men in Tanzania. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted among healthcare workers in Dar es Salaam and Tanga, Tanzania in 2018/2019. Data collection entailed qualitative interviewing, focus group discussions and participant observation. A purposive sampling strategy was used to select study participants who varied with respect to age, education level, work experience, and the type and location of the facilities they worked in. A total of 88 participants took part in the study. Results: This paper describes four different discourses that were identified among healthcare workers with respect to their perception of access to healthcare services for men who have sex with men. One held that access to healthcare was not a major problem, another that some same-sex attracted men did not utilize healthcare services although they were available to them, a third that some healthcare workers prevented these men from gaining access to healthcare and a fourth that healthcare for gender and sexual minority persons was made difficult by structural barriers. Conclusion: Although these are four rather different takes on the prevailing circumstances with respect to healthcare access for same-sex attracted men (SSAM), we suggest that they may all be “true” in the sense that they grasp and highlight different aspects of the same realities. More education is needed to healthcare providers to enable them accept SSAM who seek healthcare services and hence improve access to healthcare.

Funder

Danida Fellowship Centre

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Dermatology,Immunology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3