Affiliation:
1. Queen Mary, University of London,
Abstract
This article aims to demonstrate that, despite their potential for cultivating communitarianism and deliberative democracy on a large scale, the mass media contribute decisively to the formation of punitiveness amongst the public by means of selective semiotic aestheticisation. They overstate the problem of crime; put the blame on marginalised cohorts and level heavy criticism against the administration of prisons purportedly for laxity; issue urgent calls for ever-greater reliance on the use of strict imprisonment by the authorities and the adoption of self-policing measures by local communities and private individuals; and either mute or neutralise the attendant hardships prisoners suffer at the hands of the state. Breaking with discourses of rational linearity, whereby distorted perceptions of criminal danger result in punitive reactions, the claim is made that the imagery of crime and punishment helps audiences resolve at the level of symbolic expression contradictions which remain unconsciously insoluble at the level of everyday life.
Subject
Law,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Communication,Cultural Studies
Reference97 articles.
1. Spaces of (in)security: Media and fear of crime in a local context
2. Bauman, Z. ( 2000) Social uses of law and order. In: Garland, D. and Sparks, R. (eds) Criminology and Social Theory, pp. 23-45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献