Assessing Options for Changing the Federal Government Budget Process-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessing Options for Changing the Federal Government Budget Process

Published:2002-09 Issue:3 Volume:2 Page:436-469
ISSN:1523-9721
Container-title:Public Finance and Management
language:en
Short-container-title:Public Finance and Management

Author:

Jones L. R.¹,McCaffery Jerry¹

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Business and Public Policy Naval Postgraduate School

Abstract

The authors examine the enduring difficulties of reforming the budgetary process, explain some of the causes of these difficulties and recommend budget reforms as starting points to improve U. S. federal government budgeting. They also report on initiatives of the Bush Administration and Congress to implement performance measurement in federal management and budgeting.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Link

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/152397210200200303

Reference25 articles.

1. A Citizen's Guide to the Federal Budget. Fiscal Year 1996. (1995). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

2. BurkheadJ. (1956). Government Budgeting. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

3. CaidenN. (1982). “The Myth of the Annual Budget.” Public Administration Review 42 (Nov/Dec): 516–523.

4. CaidenN. (1983). “Guidelines to Federal Budget Reform.” Public Budgeting and Finance. 3/1 (Winter): 4–22.

5. Do Politicians Listen to Experts? The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 and The Capacity to Budget

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Diagnosing Performance Management and Performance Budgeting Systems: A Case Study of the U.S. Navy;Public Finance and Management;2010-09