Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science James Madison University
2. School of Public Administration University of Nebraska-Omaha
Abstract
We propose to expand the theoretical understanding of cutback strategies by investigating the effects of institutional constraints on fiscal outcomes during a period of severe fiscal distress. To test our research hypothesis, this study focuses on a cross-section of municipalities throughout the U.S. during and shortly after the 2008–09 recession. Using multiple data sources from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and American Community Survey (ACS), we employ a panel data from 2008 to 2011 which covers the period of the Great Recession to best capture cutback strategies during a period of severe fiscal distress. We observed differences in fiscal outcomes based on the severity of the municipal TELs. Municipalities constrained by more stringent TELs received more intergovernmental aid, incurred higher debt service expenditures and experienced less net capital investment during the most recent recessionary period. These findings support the argument that TELs, which are often neglected in discussions of cutback strategies, should be given greater consideration. This study helps shed light on the theoretical and empirical investigations of cutback strategies by offering the concept of institutional constraints and its impact on cutback strategies.
Reference69 articles.
1. Amiel L., Deller S. and Stallmann J.I. (2009) The Construction of a Tax And Expenditure Limitation Index for the US, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics Staff Paper No. 536, accessed May 16, 2016 (http://www.aae.wisc.edu/pubs/sps/pdf/stpap536.pdf).
2. How States Manage Expenditures in an Inflationary-Recessionary Economy
3. Tax Limitations and Revenue Shifting Strategies in Local Government
4. Hard Lessons from Hard Times: Reconsidering and Reorienting the “Managing Decline” Literature
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献