Beware the kudzu: Corporate creep, university consumers, and epistemic injustice-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Beware the kudzu: Corporate creep, university consumers, and epistemic injustice

Published:2022-06-23 Issue:4 Volume:21 Page:643-659
ISSN:1473-3250
Container-title:Qualitative Social Work
language:en
Short-container-title:Qualitative Social Work

Author:

Staller Karen M¹

Affiliation:

1. University of Michigan School of Social Work, USA

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14733250221106639

Reference40 articles.

1. Baas J, Fennell C (2019) When peer reviewers go rogue-Estimated prevalence of citation manipulation by reviewers based on the citation patterns of 69,000 reviewers. go.nature.com/2m8nidy

2. Use of the h-index to measure the quality of the output of health services researchers

3. Characteristics of highly cited researchers 2015 in Germany

4. Elsevier investigates hundreds of peer reviewers for manipulating citations

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Caring for our graduate academy;Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education;2024-11

2. So chef, does a PhD matter? A Malaysian perspective(s) on Bucher and Lee;International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science;2024-06

3. The 100 Most Impactful Global Contributors to Social Work Publications: An Update Based on 2023 Data;Research on Social Work Practice;2024-02-15

4. Using research to build power: the Pittsburgh Wage study;Journal of Community Practice;2023-10-02

5. Mastodon over Mammon: towards publicly owned scholarly knowledge;Royal Society Open Science;2023-07