Making claims on nursing work

Author:

Spilsbury Karen,Meyer Julienne1

Affiliation:

1. St Bartholomew School of Nursing and Midwifery, City University

Abstract

Throughout the NHS, the traditional boundaries between professional groups are breaking down to promote more flexible ways of working to deliver patient-centred care. Registered nurses (RNs) have responded to changing care demands through the development of innovative roles and extended roles and responsibilities. However, there are increasing numbers of healthcare assistants (HCAs) being employed by the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK to support RNs in providing nursing care. To date, little is known about the make-up of the health care assistant workforce and the changing nature of their role. This paper reports the findings of a single case study using mixed methods (survey, interviews, participant observations, focus groups and documentary analysis) to generate an in-depth account of HCAs' work in one UK hospital setting. The study is built upon what HCAs say they do, compared with what they actually do in practice and RNs’ perceptions of the HCA role. It explores how and whether the work of HCAs is adequately supervised, tensions between the work of HCAs and RNs and the subsequent effects on teamwork and patient care. There are policy expectations associated with the work of HCAs. However, this study reveals significant deviations from these goals. The workplace arena, and the informal negotiations between HCAs and RNs that take place within it, actively shape the HCAs’ work. The changing roles of RNs have direct implications for the roles of HCAs: as RNs take on extra duties and responsibilities they are conceding some of their roles to HCAs. An important element of the RNs’ role must now be to consider how HCAs can best be deployed, to assess their competence for carrying out nursing work, and to monitor and supervise their work so as to maximise, and further develop, the HCAs’ contribution to patient care and to ensure quality standards.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Research and Theory

Cited by 41 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3