An analysis of the ability of nurses to identify the anxiety levels of patients in general medical and surgical wards

Author:

Teasdale Kevin1,Mulraney Stephen1,Blanchard Helen2,Rolfe Jayne2,Pallett Steven2

Affiliation:

1. United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Pilgrim Hospital, Boston, Lincolnshire

2. United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln

Abstract

The study investigated whether qualified nurses could distinguish between low and high anxiety in general medical and surgical wards. The sample comprised 94 patients and 62 nurses in two district general hospitals. The patients completed the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Version Y and were divided into high and low anxiety groups by reference to the published norms for the inventory. The nurses independently rated the patients into either high or low anxiety groups according to whether or not they believed individual patients needed more nursing time than was usual to help them to manage their anxiety. The joint ratings were signficant beyond the 0.01 level, supporting the hypothesis that the nurses could distinguish between high and low anxiety patients. However when data from the two hospitals were separated, the overall results were only significant in the hospital where patients had reported significantly lower average levels of anxiety. A tentative explanatory hypothesis is that assessment of patients may be easier where the general background level of patient anxiety in a ward is relatively low. In a subsidiary part of the study, feedback and group training failed to increase the correspondence between nurses' ratings and those obtained from the patients' questionnaires. The research method for comparing the views of patients with those of nurses proved practical for implementation in busy hospital wards and may therefore be useful for other investigations in similar settings.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Research and Theory

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3