Affiliation:
1. University of California, Berkeley
Abstract
In recent years two broad approaches to public policy have emerged which offer solutions for the problems of government, one based on the market and the other based on conflict resolution This paper argues that both policy approaches are plagued by problems caused by inequality and coercion Part I reviews the normative bases of the market, including discussion of how a system of property rights, enforced by government must exist in order to determine exactly who is free to do what Part II is a presentation of the conflict resolution approach and its pitfalls, especially when this activity is carried out between unequal parties Finally, Part III spells out the conditions for non-coercive conflict resolution The basis is the extension of rights which are universal and inalienable in order to achieve a more egalitarian society
Subject
Urban Studies,Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Spatial Conflict in Urban Kampong Development A Case Study in Kampong Pendrikan, Semarang;IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science;2018-12-28
2. Planning Theory as Culture and Experience;Journal of Planning Education and Research;1995-04
3. Negotiating local autonomy;Political Geography;1994-09
4. Spatial conflict and conflict resolution, a classroom simulation;Journal of Geography in Higher Education;1990-01
5. Letters to the Editors;Journal of the American Planning Association;1987-03-31