Affiliation:
1. School of Urban Planning at McGill University, Montreal;
Abstract
Given the philosophical oppositioin that cxisted between Foucault atnd Habermas, a FotucaulIdian reading of communicative planining theory may yield a very critical assessnient of that body of work. Rather than develop such a critique, this paper shows that there are in fact significant points of agreement between communicative theorists and the French historian of modernity, in particular with respect to the relationship between theory and practice. However, Foucault's work raises important questions about the relationship between theory and history, and it challenges Forester, Healey, and others to situate communicative planniing in its historical context and to assess the dangers that it poses for individuals and for society at large.
Subject
Urban Studies,Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Cited by
87 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献