Affiliation:
1. Institute of Social Studies, The Hague
Abstract
This article looks at the struggles and actions over environmental issues in the context of the developing world. Drawing on some well-known cases across three continents, Asia, Africa and Latin America, the article looks at the strengths and weaknesses of the `livelihood approach' that seems to dominate the analysis of environmental movements. It is argued that while the livelihood approach may be appropriate to explain resource conflicts, the study of movements requires attention on political variables: actors, stakes and practices, and so forth. The article therefore calls for a forceful integration of collective action and social movement theories with livelihood approaches to better understand environmental movements.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献