Affiliation:
1. Georgia State University
Abstract
In April 1993, the government issued guidelines for the treatment of major depression in primary care, stressing a pharmacological approach. Although several professional associations have endorsed these guidelines, the American Psychological Association has declined to do so. Primary care physicians consult with social workers on mental health issues, so social workers need to be aware of the questions that have been raised in the context of the controversy over the guidelines. An educated position on the controversy can only come from familiarity with the empirical literature on the research-based benefits and costs of drug treatment versus psychotherapy for major depression. This article offers the needed literature review, after first summarizing the nature of the depression-guidelines controversy.
Subject
General Psychology,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献