Patient Experiences and Opinions of a Behavioral Activation Group Intervention for Depression

Author:

O’Neill Laura12,Samaan Zainab1234,McCabe Kathleen12,Tabak Terri Ann12,Key Brenda12,Litke Kathryn2,Whattam Jeff2,Garrick Laura2,Chalmers Sandra,Xie Feng3,Thabane Lehana35678,Patel Yogita2,Shahid Hamnah1,Zielinski Laura1,Vanstone Meredith9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

2. Mood Disorders Program, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

3. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

4. Population Genomics Program, Chanchlani Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

5. Centre for Evaluation of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

6. System-Linked Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

7. Department of Anaesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

8. Department of Paediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

9. Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Purpose: Major depressive disorder is the leading cause of disability worldwide. This study is part of a mixed methods pilot trial, exploring the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of providing behavioral activation (BA) treatment in a group format. Methods: Using an applied, descriptive approach, qualitative data were collected from individual interviews (18) and focus groups (5) at multiple data points throughout the trial and feedback given to group facilitators, who adapted the program accordingly. Results: Group BA is an effective and acceptable treatment format when a client-centered, flexible approach is utilized. This contrasted with findings from the comparison intervention, a peer support group, from which participants reported no benefit. Conclusions: Group BA is beneficial in a fiscally responsible evidenced-based health-care culture. Comparator groups need to be carefully selected. Engaging patient and clinician perspectives when designing and implementing new clinical interventions is vital in informing future research and social work practice.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3