Interventions that Address Institutional Child Maltreatment: An Evidence and Gap Map

Author:

Finch Meghan1,Featherston Rebecca2ORCID,Chakraborty Sangita3,Bjørndal Ludvig3,Mildon Robyn3,Albers Bianca3,Fiennes Caroline4,Taylor David J. A.3ORCID,Schachtman Rebecca3,Yang Taoran2,Shlonsky Aron2

Affiliation:

1. National Centre for Implementation Science, Newcastle University, Wallsend, NSW, Australia

2. Department of Social Work, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Caulfield, Vic, Australia

3. Centre for Evidence and Implementation, Melbourne, Vic, Australia

4. Giving Evidence, London, UK

Abstract

Purpose This evidence and gap map collates evidence reporting on the effectiveness of interventions aimed to prevent, disclose, respond to, or treat child maltreatment occurring in institutional settings. Methods A comprehensive and systematic literature search identified primary studies and systematic reviews meeting the review’s eligibility criteria. Literature screening, data extraction and critical appraisals were undertaken independently by multiple reviewers. Data extracted and reported from the included studies included information about the institutional setting, target population, type of maltreatment, intervention type and outcomes. Results Seventy-three studies were identified, including 11 systematic reviews and 62 primary studies. Overall, the methodological quality of the studies was low to moderate. Most evaluated curriculum-based interventions delivered in educational settings, primarily aimed at preventing sexual abuse. Fewer studies examined other institutional settings or intervention types. Conclusions This review highlights a need for high-quality studies evaluating a more diverse range of interventions across more varied institutional contexts.

Funder

Porticus

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3