Abstract
The methods used for calculating economic lamp lives by Strange and Prais are examined. It is concluded that neither is completely sound and an alternative formula is developed. The results although differing in detail from those of Strange are broadly in accordance with his findings. The longer economic lives suggested by Prais cannot be justified. No support for any general change in the rated life of electric lamps comes from these figures, but it is suggested that it might be worth offering a long life lamp of relatively low wattage for domestic use. For commercial consumers no single lamp life is likely to cover the range of situations to be found in practice.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献