Responding to Microaggressions: Social Cost of Bystander Intervention Strategies

Author:

Xie Tianyi1ORCID,Galliher Renee V.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University Counseling Service, The University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, USA

2. Department of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA

Abstract

This two-part study examined the effects of intervener’s race (White vs. Asian) and intervention format (high-threat—emphasizing the act of racism, low-threat—emphasizing the norm of justice, support-based—emphasizing a nonjudgmental attitude) on perceptions of microaggression interventions for White observers and Asian American targets. In separate 2 x 3 experimental designs, Asian Americans participants ( N = 187) and White American participants ( N = 185) were recruited through Qualtrics panels and randomly assigned to one of six conditions (three formats of intervention and two intervener groups). Participants read a vignette, imagined themselves as targets of the microaggression (Asian sample) or witnesses of the interaction (White sample), and completed a set of questionnaires assessing positive and negative perceptions of the intervener and aggressor. Asian American targets and White witnesses had more negative perceptions of interveners in the high threat condition. Covariates were relevant in interpreting reactions to intervention.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Psychology

Reference66 articles.

1. Asian Pacific Policy, Planning Council & Chinese for Affirmative Action. (2020, May 13). In Six Weeks, STOP AAPI HATE Receives Over 1700 Incident Reports of Verbal Harassment, Shunning and Physical. Stop AAPI Hate. http://www.asianpacificpolicyandplanningcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/Press_Release_5_13_20.pdf

2. Dignity, Face, and Honor cultures: implications for negotiation and conflict management

3. The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure—Revised: Measurement invariance across racial and ethnic groups.

4. A Pedagogical Model for Increasing Race-Related Multicultural Counseling Competency 1ψ7

5. Anti-Asian sentiment in the United States – COVID-19 and history

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Counterspeakers’ Perspectives: Unveiling Barriers and AI Needs in the Fight against Online Hate;Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3