Affiliation:
1. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Abstract
Treatment context may have a unique impact on psychotherapy outcomes, above and beyond client, therapist, and therapy process variables. University counseling centers represent one such treatment context facing increasing treatment demands. This study examined the role of counseling centers and center variables in explaining differences in psychotherapy outcomes. The Center for Collegiate Mental Health, a large practice–research network, contained data from 116 counseling centers, 2,362 therapists, and 58,423 clients. Multilevel modeling tested if some counseling centers systematically achieved better outcomes than others (a “center effect”). Outcome was operationalized as clients’ magnitude and rate of change in distress across treatment. Results showed a relatively small “center effect” for both outcomes. Analyses sought to explain that center effect through administrative policies and characteristics. As a group, these variables partially explained the center effect. None explained a large portion of total outcome variance. Potential future implications for policy and advocacy efforts are discussed.
Reference39 articles.
1. Alschuler K., Hoodin F., Byrd M. (2008). The need for integrating behavioral care in a college health center. Health Psychology, 27(3), 388–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.388
2. American Psychological Association. (n.d.) APA accreditation. www.accreditation.apa.org
3. Bolker B. M., Brooks M. E., Clark C. J., Geange S. W., Poulsen J. R., Stevens M. H. H., White J. S. (2009). Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(3), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
4. Center for Collegiate Mental Health. (2016). 2015 Annual report (Publication No. STA 15-108). https://ccmh.psu.edu/files/2017/10/2015_CCMH_Report_1-18-2015-yq3vik.pdf
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献