Investigation of contribution of number of trials in Monte Carlo simulation for uncertainty estimation for a pressure balance

Author:

Singh Jasveer12ORCID,Bura Neha13ORCID,Kaushik Kapil4,Kumaraswamidhas Lakshmi Annamalai2,Dilawar Sharma Nita13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Pressure, Vacuum & Ultrasonic Metrology Section, CSIR-National Physical Laboratory, India

2. Department of Mining Machinery Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), India

3. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), India

4. Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd., India

Abstract

It is well established that the estimation of measurement uncertainty is vital for the validation of any measurement and is an essential parameter of quality assurance. Apart from the conventional technique of law of propagation of uncertainty (LPU), which has many limitations, Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) technique has become an essential tool for the estimation of measurement uncertainty in various fields of metrology. The most critical factor in MCS is the generation of random numbers of the input quantities according to their probability distributions. The number of Monte Carlo trials to generate these random numbers significantly affects the results. In particular, the required number of trials is also affected by the parameter for which the uncertainty is to be estimated. Hence, in the current paper, the effect of selection of the number of trials on the random number generation and the resulting output in terms of standard deviation (SD) is investigated for the uncertainty in the effective area of a pneumatic reference pressure standard (NPLI-4) at the CSIR-National Physical Laboratory of India. The simulation results thus obtained are compared amongst themselves, with an adaptive approach as well as with the experimental results. The outcomes are analyzed and discussed in detail.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Instrumentation

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3