Clinical outcomes of mild versus moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion in adult aortic arch surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objectives In adult aortic arch surgery, moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP) (MoHACP) is widely used, but the application of mild HCA with SACP (MiHACP) is still controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare clinical outcomes using MiHACP or MoHACP. Methods Studies comparing outcomes of MiHACP or MoHACP in adult aortic arch surgery were searched from four databases from inception through April 2022. Primary outcomes were postoperative permanent neurological deficit (PND), temporary neurological deficit (TND), and mortality. Secondary outcomes included other common complications. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model in all cases. Results Eleven comparative studies were included, with 1555 patients in MiHACP group and 1499 patients in MoHACP group, and the mean HCA temperature were 29.4°C and 24.8°C, respectively. Postoperative PND, TND, mortality, paraplegia, dialysis, tracheotomy, reexploration for bleeding, and chest tube drainage volume were comparable in the two groups ( p > 0.05). Ventilator time, intensive care unit and in-hospital length of stay were shorter in MiHACP group ( p < 0.05). Outcomes were also comparable or had some benefits in MiHACP group when subgroup analyses were conducted according to hemiarch or total arch replacement, unilateral or bilateral SACP, HCA time, emergency aortic dissection surgery, and concomitant procedure. Conclusion The present meta-analysis showed acceptability of MiHACP in adult aortic arch surgery. Results need to be taken with caution as moderate risk of bias and very low quality of evidence were observed in this meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials are needed for further analysis.