What is the weakest point of a secured aortic cannula in central extracorporeal membrane oxygenation?

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare techniques for securing the aortic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cannula, using in vitro models. Methods Two models were studied: a tissue model using porcine aortas and a stand model replacing the aorta with a metal stand to study the system independent of the tissue. Interventions in each model were divided into three experimental groups: Group 1 (3-0 Prolene® + 20-French Medtronic Arterial Cannula EOPA™), Group 2 (4-0 Prolene® + 16-French Medtronic Arterial Cannula DLP Pediatric), and Group 3 (5-0 Prolene® + 8-French Medtronic Arterial Cannula DLP Pediatric). In separate experiments, both gradual and rapid forces were applied to the cannulas, starting with 9.8 Newtons and increasing exponentially if the cannula remained secured. Additionally, the method of securing the tourniquet and the number of ties securing the tourniquet to the cannula were evaluated. Results In the tissue model, even with a minimum force of 9.8 Newtons, the suture pulled through the aortic tissue, leaving sutures and ties intact. In the stand model, two purse-string sutures secured by two ligaclips held the cannula reliably and withstood higher total force. Dislodgement was prevented at forces close to 60 Newtons with only two hemostatic clips included in cannulation. Conclusions The weakest part of the aortic ECMO cannulation system using in vitro experiments was the tissue. Assuming that these experiments translate in vivo, it is therefore critical to prevent any pull on the cannulas by securing ECMO cannulas and ECMO tubing to both the patient and the patient’s bed. Sutures with a larger diameter withstand more force. Two medium hemostatic clips can secure Prolene® sutures within snares as safely as a mosquito hemostat. Two polypropylene purse-string sutures secured by two hemostatic clips were most reliable at greater forces. The rationale for publishing our experiments in this manuscript is to (1) communicate our quantification of possible contributing factors to this rare and likely catastrophic complication of unintended decannulation, (2) increase awareness about this potential complication, and (3) increase vigilance to assure prevention of this dreaded complication.