Biocompatibility of three different membrane oxygenators: effects on complement, neutrophil and monocyte activation

Author:

de Vroege R1,Rutten P MMJ2,Kalkman C3,Out T A4,Jansen P GM1,Eijsman L1,de Mol B JM2,Wildevuur C RH1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam

2. Department of Cardiopulmonary Surgery, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam

3. Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam

4. Clinical Immunology Laboratory, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam

Abstract

The inflammatory reaction of extracorporeal circuits can be assessed by measuring complement activation and the release of activation markers of leucocytes. The purpose of this study was to compare three commercially available membrane oxygenators with respect to complement (C3a), granulocyte (lactoferrin) and monocyte (interleukin-6, IL-6) activation. Thirty patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to undergo cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with one of the following oxygenators: a polypropylene hollow-fibre membrane (group 1; 2.2 m2), a polypropylene flat-sheet membrane (group 2; 3.1 m2) or a silicone envelope membrane (group 3; 3.5 m2). In all patients, a significant increase in C3a in plasma occurred during CPB with peak levels after the administration of protamine sulphate. In blood samples taken before aortic crossclamp release, at the end of CPB, and 20 min after protamine administration C3a was significantly lower in group 1 than in the other two groups. Lactoferrin increased significantly during CPB in all patients without a significant difference between the groups. IL-6 did not increase during CPB, but raised significantly after 4 h in the intensive care unit in all groups. Moreover, IL-6 was significant lower in group 1 than group 3. The data suggest that the polypropylene hollow-fibre membrane oxygenator, i.e. the oxygenator with the smallest surface area, is more biocompatible than the other types, probably because of a smaller contact surface area.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Safety Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3