Anticoagulation practices during neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: survey results

Author:

Graves Donna F1,Chernin Jill M1,Kurusz Mark1,Zwischenberger Joseph B1

Affiliation:

1. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Programme, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas

Abstract

To ascertain current anticoagulation management during neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a telephone survey was undertaken of all active ECMO (n = 81, 100% response rate) centres in the USA. Hospital policies regarding federal regulations governing laboratory tests [Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) 1988] were determined along with specific patient anticoagulation strategies and use of specific activated coagulation time (ACT) equipment. More than 90% of the respondents use the Hemochron device (International Technidyne Corp, Edison, NJ, USA) while the remaining centres use the Hemotec device (Medtronic Hemotec, Inc, Englewood, CO, USA). Quality control (QC) testing is performed by most centres, but there is no consensus regarding frequency of testing nor methods for dealing with abnormal results. Nearly one-half of the centres use beef lung-derived heparin and the other half use porcine intestinal-derived heparin. One-half of the programmes had a minimum heparin dose despite the ACT value, but the range varied significantly. Four out of five respondents reported that heparin dosages were dictated strictly by ACT results, and 63% will temporarily stop heparin administration for high ACT results, bleeding and/or surgery. Approximately one-third of the centres perform proficiency testing of the equipment in compliance with CLIA 1988. In conclusion, there appears to be no consensus regarding commitment to a QC programme among active ECMO centres.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Safety Research,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3