A multi-institutional assessment of low-dose protocols in chest computed tomography: Dose and image quality

Author:

Tonkopi Elena123ORCID,Tetteh Mercy Afadzi4,Gunn Catherine25,Ashraf Haseem46,Rusten Sigrid Lia7,Safi Perkhah7,Tinsoe Nora Suu7,Colford Kylie5,Ouellet Olivia5,Naimi Salma4,Johansen Safora789ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada

4. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, Loerenskog, Norway

5. School of Health Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

6. Medicine Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo Norway

7. Health Faculty, Department of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University Oslo, Norway

8. Department of Cancer Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

9. Health and Social Science Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore

Abstract

Background Low-dose CT (LDCT) chest protocols have widespread clinical applications for many indications; as a result, there is a need for protocol assessment prior to standardization. Dalhousie University and Oslo Metropolitan University have a formally established cooperative relationship. Purpose The purpose is to assess radiation dose and image quality for LDCT chest protocols in seven different hospital locations in Norway and Canada. Material and methods Retrospective dosimetry data, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose length product (DLP) from 240 average-sized patients as well as CT protocol parameters were included in the survey. Effective dose (ED) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were calculated for each examination. For a quantitative image quality analysis, noise, CT number, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were determined for three regions in the chest. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for lung parenchyma in comparison to the subcutaneous fat. Differences in dose and image quality were evaluated by a single-factor ANOVA test. A two-sample t-test was performed to determine differences in means between individual scanners. Results The ANOVA test revealed significant differences ( p < .05) in dose values for all scanners, including identical scanner models. Statistically significant differences ( p < .05) were determined in mean values of the SNR distributions between the scanners in all three measured regions in the chest, as well as the CNR values. Conclusion The observed variations in dose and image quality measurements, even within the same hospitals and between identical scanner models, indicate a potential for protocol optimization in the involved hospitals in both countries.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3