Birth attendants’ attitudes and practice of companionship during facility-based childbirth and associated factors in the West Shoa Zone, central Ethiopia: A mixed method design

Author:

Doba Yonas Sagni1ORCID,Bulto Gizachew Abdissa2ORCID,Tefera Eden Girmaye2,Wakgari Negash2,Daksisa Temesgen3,Muda Tura4,Daba Dina Gurmessa2,Moti Berhanu Ejara2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hosanna, Ethiopia

2. Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia

3. Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mada Walabu University, Shashemane, Ethiopia

4. Elwaye District Health Office, Borena Zone, Yabello, Ethiopia

Abstract

Objectives: The World Health Organization strongly recommends companion of choice for all women during health facility delivery. However, in the developing countries, it is low and not well studied in Ethiopia. Thus, the study aimed to assess the birth attendants’ attitude and practice of companionship during health facility-based childbirth and associated factors in the West Shoa Zone, Ethiopia. Methods: A cross-sectional study design with a concurrent mixed method approach was employed from 17 August to 23 September 2021. A simple random sampling was used to collect data from 422 birth attendants using a pretested structured self-administered questionnaire. The data was entered into Epi-data 3.1 and exported to the Statistical Package for Social Sciences for analysis. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were done. The qualitative data was analyzed manually using thematic analysis, and the result was triangulated with the quantitative data. Results: About, 208 (51.2%) of birth attendants had favorable attitude, and only 79 (19.5%) of them reported that they practice companion presence during childbirth. Reported job satisfaction (adjusted odds ratio = 5.29, 95% confidence interval: 3.08, 9.1), presence of a screen (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.94, 5.99), and wideness of the delivery room (adjusted odds ratio = 4.74, 95% confidence interval: 2.48, 9.04) were factors associated with the attitude of birth attendants. The number of deliveries per month (adjusted odds ratio = 3.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.37, 8.13), having had training (adjusted odds ratio = 3.286, 95% confidence interval: 1.52, 7.08), and presence of a screen (adjusted odds ratio = 2.88, 95% confidence interval: 1.42, 5.85) were statistically associated with practice of companion presence during childbirth. The main themes that emerged as the key barriers to the practice of companion presence during childbirth include structural factors, societal norms and culture, lack of interest, birth attendant-related barriers, unsupportive administration protocol, and companions’ awareness. Conclusion: The magnitude of favorable attitudes and reported practice of birth attendants regarding companion presence during childbirth is low. Structural related factors were the main barriers. Training of birth attendants and structural interventions are needed to ensure that delivery rooms are designed in ways that facilitate the presence of companions during childbirth.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Continuous support for women during childbirth

2. World Health Organization. Why having a companion during labour and childbirth may be better for you. World Health Organization, 2019, https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/companion-during-labour-childbirth/en/

3. World Health Organization. Companion of choice during labour and childbirth for improved quality of care. Publ World Heal Organ 2014; 4: 1–7, www.who.int/health-topics/maternal-health

4. WHO Recommendations. Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018, www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3