Practice of Health Care Governance among South Wollo Department Heads and Managers of Public Health Institutions, Northeast Ethiopia

Author:

Solomon Getye1,Feleke Amsalu2,Yasin Toyeb3,Alemu Mamo Dereje4ORCID,Getachew Nigusu5,Worku Nigusu2,Chanie Muluken Genetu3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency, Dessie Specialized Referral Hospital, Dessie, Ethiopia

2. Department of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

3. Department of Health Systems and Policy, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia

4. Health System Strengthening and Special Support Directorate, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

5. Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia

Abstract

Objective: Governance in health care generally means strengthening leadership and governance functions, improving systems, and having both central and local governments jointly take responsibility for overall health system performance. More than half of the world’s population has expressed distrust of state institutions including the health sector. Ethiopia, like other African countries, faces many challenges in the process of good governance building. The aim of this study was to assess the practices health care governance in the South Wollo Zone health sectors, Northeast Ethiopia. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study design was conducted in the South Wollo from 15 May to 15 June 2021. A simple random sampling technique was used, and the data were collected using a structured survey. The data were entered into Epi data version 4.6 for cleaning and exported to SPSS v.25 for further analysis. We performed binary and multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify factors of governance practices. Variables with p values less than 0.05 during multivariable logistic regression analysis were declared statistically significant. Results: A 96.75% (387) of the study participants completed the study questionnaires. Out of these, 37.98% (95% confidence interval: 33.1%, 42.9%) have been found practicing good governance in the health sector. Having had training (adjusted odds ratio = 7.92, 95% confidence interval: 4.04, 15.51), having job descriptions (adjusted odds ratio = 2.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.03, 4.09), opportunity to share with peers (adjusted odds ratio = 6.64, 95% confidence interval: 3.02, 14.62), political interference (adjusted odds ratio = 0.40, 95% confidence interval: 0.22, 0.71), and age < 25 years (adjusted odds ratio = 0.13, 95% confidence interval: 0.02, 0.77) were found to have a statistically significant association with the governance practice of managers. Conclusion: The overall practice of governance was found poor in light of the national and World Health Organization standards for health sector Governance. Having had training, having job descriptions and the opportunity to share with peers significantly increased the odds of good governance while political interference and young age significantly decreased the odds of good governance. Managers could implement training, write job descriptions, and encourage sharing with peers to improve governance.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Worku M. Assessment of the prevalence of good governance in public sector: the case of selected public institutions in Addis Ababa city of Ethiopia, April 2013, http://197.156.93.91/bitstream/123456789/2779/1/Misgana%20Worku.pdf

2. Organization and Governance: Stewardship and Governance in Health Systems

3. Kickbusch I, Gleicher D. Governance for health in the 21st century, 2012, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/326429/9789289002745-eng.pdf

4. World Health Organization. Multisectoral and intersectoral action for improved health and well-being for all: mapping of the WHO European Region: governance for a sustainable future: improving health and well-being for all, 2018, https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/371435/multisectoral-report-h1720-eng.pdf

5. Amedie MC. The significance and practice of good governance in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, January 2014, http://www.repository.smuc.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/2808/1/Mulat%20Chanyalew.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3