Exploring pharmacovigilance practices and knowledge among healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional multicenter study

Author:

Hayek Abdulkader1,Sridhar Sathvik B1ORCID,Rabbani Syed Arman1ORCID,Shareef Javed1,Wadhwa Tarun1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, RAK College of Pharmacy, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare professionals’ awareness of adverse drug reaction reporting and pharmacovigilance practices differ by country. The study assesses healthcare professionals’ knowledge, practice, and potential barriers to pharmacovigilance-related practices and reporting adverse drug reaction. Methods: A cross-sectional investigation was conducted in government and private healthcare settings. The study included licensed physicians, pharmacists, and nurses. To examine knowledge, practice, and potential barriers to pharmacovigilance-related practices and adverse drug reaction reporting, a 22-item validated questionnaire was used. Results: The final analysis included 311 healthcare professionals. Most healthcare professionals, 59% ( N = 182), mentioned encountering patients with adverse drug reactions during the last year. On the other hand, most healthcare professionals, 54% ( n = 167), mentioned that they had not reported adverse drug reactions. A good proportion of respondents mentioned that it is essential to report adverse drug reactions ( N = 288, 92.6%), availability of adverse drug reactions reporting forms in practice sites ( N = 216, 69.5%), had awareness regarding how to report adverse drug reactions ( N = 221, 71.1%), the necessity of reporting minor/less important adverse drug reactions ( N = 265, 85.2%), and were trained on how to report adverse drug reactions ( N = 201, 64.6%). Adverse drug reaction reporting program in the United Arab Emirates ( N = 148, 47.6) was known to many healthcare professionals. Lack of time was the major impediment to reporting adverse drug reactions at 42.7% ( N = 133). The predictor variable work experience does add to the model ( p < 0.05) concerning association with filling of adverse drug reaction forms (Estimate = 0.380; SE = 0.452; p = 0.400), professional role (Estimate = 0.454; SE = 0.673; p = 0.500). In addition, the predictor variable practice setting adds to the model ( p < 0.05) concerning the knowledge regarding the availability of adverse drug reaction reporting forms (Estimate = −1.229; SE = 0.298; p = 0.000), training on how to report adverse drug reactions (Estimate = −0.660; SE = 0.294; p = 0.025), and awareness regarding the adverse drug reaction reporting program in the United Arab Emirates (Estimate = −1.032; SE = 0.280; p = 0.000). Conclusion: Pharmacists had the most knowledge regarding adverse drug reaction reporting and pharmacovigilance. The underreporting of adverse drug reactions was documented among physicians and nurses. Lack of time was the most significant barrier to reporting adverse drug reactions, followed by uncertainty and complicated adverse drug reaction documentation forms.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3