Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging neurography assessment of diagnostic criteria in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome using electrophysiological tests as gold standard: A prospective study

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluating peripheral neuropathy mainly relies on physical examination, patient history, and electrophysiological studies. High-resolution ultrasound is a fast, noninvasive modality for dynamic nerve assessment that enables the length of the nerve to be examined. Magnetic resonance imaging is preferred for examining deeper nerves with a high contrast resolution; its use shows excellent benefit in patients with atypical presentation, equivocal diagnosis, suspected secondary causes, and postsurgical relapse. We aimed to assess the measurements and criteria for both ultrasound and magnetic resonance neurography for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome, based mainly on the three measurements assessed by Buchberger et al. Methods: This prospective study was conducted to test diagnostic accuracy. Thirty-two patients who presented clinically with, and were diagnosed by electrophysiological tests as having, carpal tunnel syndrome participated. Superficial ultrasound of the wrist joint was performed on all participants, followed by magnetic resonance imaging within 1 week of ultrasonography. Results: The three main parameters of cross-sectional area measurement, distal nerve flattening, and flexor retinaculum bowing indices showed positive occurrences of 93.7%, 59.4%, and 59.4%, respectively; 90.6% of patients had decreased nerve echotexture. The diagnostic ability of magnetic resonance imaging was decreased when cross-sectional area measurements were used: positive results were achieved in 81.2% of patients, but the positive results showing the distal tunnel nerve increased flattening and bowed flexor retinaculum slightly decreased to 56.2% for each. A high T2 signal of the median nerve was observed in 90.6% of patients. In an agreement analysis, we found a statistically significant difference that supported the use of ultrasound as a primary diagnostic modality for carpal tunnel syndrome. However, magnetic resonance imaging improved tissue characterization and was a good diagnostic modality, with a statistically significant difference, for cases of secondary carpal tunnel syndrome, detection of the underlying entrapping cause, and early abnormality detection in the innervated muscle. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that ultrasound examination can be used as the first imaging modality after physician evaluation, with results comparable to those of electrophysiological studies for evaluating carpal tunnel syndrome and determining its cause. Magnetic resonance neurography examination is the second step in detecting secondary causes in cases with suspected early muscle denervation changes that cannot be elicited by ultrasound or in cases with equivocal results.