What’s at Stake in High-Stakes Testing

Author:

Barksdale-Ladd Mary Alice1,Thomas Karen F.2

Affiliation:

1. University of South Florida

2. Western Michigan University

Abstract

This article reports findings from interviews with 59 teachers and 20 parents in two large states. Both have standards, attendant benchmarks, and standardized tests to assess students on the standards. Interview protocols from teachers and parents rendered data informing us about (a) teacher and parent knowledge of state standards and testing; (b) teacher test administration and student preparation practices; (c) effects of tests on teachers, parents, and students; (d) how teachers make instructional decisions based on these tests; and (e) the value of such tests. Teachers and parents were unanimous about (a) the intense stress on all involved, (b) the undermining of meaningful instruction and learning, and (c) the high stakes involved. Differences existed between teachers and parents in the two states. Implications address the need for stakeholders in children’s education to make known the deleterious effects of state testing to those in charge of state-mandated testing.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

Reference29 articles.

Cited by 129 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Applying dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM) to examine the dynamics of students’ affect and learning goal achievement;Contemporary Educational Psychology;2024-09

2. Teaching in Neoliberal Times: Unraveling Teacher Voices at Basic High Schools in Türkiye;Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi;2024-06-30

3. The Long-Run Effects of Consequential School Accountability;Journal of Labor Economics;2024-05-09

4. Innovation in a Context of Accountability: A Study of Educators’ Experiences in a Massachusetts Innovation School;The Educational Forum;2024-04-10

5. Not Another Discussion Board;Balance and Boundaries in Creating Meaningful Relationships in Online Higher Education;2023-12-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3