How Do Pronatalist Policies Impact Women’s Access to Safe Abortion Services in Turkey?

Author:

Telli Pınar1ORCID,Cesuroğlu Tomris2,Aksu Tanık Feride3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands

2. Athena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

3. Human Rights Foundation Turkey, Izmir Division, Turkey

Abstract

A pronatalist discourse and anti-abortion rhetoric used by prominent politicians in Turkey, prior to and following the proposed ban of abortion in 2012, have resulted in reports of women facing difficulty accessing safe abortion services (SAS), risking the resurgence of unsafe abortions. We conducted a qualitative study to identify the impact of the ongoing pronatalist discourse on women’s access to SAS, using semi-structured interviews with 19 experts (16 female, 3 male) in reproductive health, including academics, doctors, midwives, and health authorities. Participants from 4 cities (Ankara, Istanbul, Izmir, and Manisa) were identified through a combined snowball and purposive sampling technique. The findings show that the pronatalist discourse has directly and indirectly inhibited access to SAS. Women’s and health professionals’ perception of abortion services has been tainted by rhetoric; provision of SAS in the public sector is slowly ceasing; and health reform-related organizational changes have diminished access to family planning services and contraceptive methods. Provision of SAS in the private sector continues but is only accessible for women with sufficient financial means. Preventing women’s access to SAS risks a rise in unwanted pregnancies and—consequently—in the number of women who may seek dangerous alternatives, including unsafe, life-threatening abortions.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Beyond fertility figures: towards reproductive rights and choices;Humanities and Social Sciences Communications;2024-01-16

2. ‘We had that abortion together’: abortion networks and access to il/legal abortions in Turkey;Culture, Health & Sexuality;2024-01-09

3. Women's experience of terminating unwanted pregnancies in other than official health facility: A qualitative study;Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care;2023-06-20

4. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Young People: A Social Science Approach;Handbook of Social Sciences and Global Public Health;2023

5. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Young People: A Social Science Approach;Handbook of Social Sciences and Global Public Health;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3