Reducing Health Inequalities: Comparison of Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction According to Health Provider in Chile

Abstract

Health inequalities are marked in Chile. To address this situation, a health reform was implemented in 2005 that guarantees acute myocardial infarction (AMI) health care for the entire population. We evaluated if the health reform changed AMI early and long-term survival rates by hospital provider (public/private) using a longitudinal population-based study of patients ≥15 years with a first AMI in Chile between 2002 and 2011. Time trends and early (within 28 days) and long-term (29–365 days) survival by age were assessed. We identified 59,557 patients: median age of 64 years; 68.9% men; 83.2% treated at public hospitals; 74.4% with public insurance. Early and long-term case-fatality was higher at public hospitals (14.6% vs 9.3%; P < .001 and 5.8% vs 3.3%; P < .001, respectively). There was a higher annual increase for early and long-term survival in public hospitals, 0.008 percentage points (95% CI: 0.006, 0.009; P < .0001) and 0.03 (0.002, 0.003; P < .0001), than in private hospitals, 0.0002 (95% CI: −0.0001, 0.005; P = .10) and 0.002 (95% CI: 0.0007, 0.003; P = .004), respectively. Being served at public hospitals affected early and long-term survival, especially in patients <70 years: hazard ratio was 2.01 (95% CI: 1.77, 2.28) and 3.11 (2.41, 4.01), respectively. Therefore, even if inequalities persist, there was a higher increase in early and long-term survival in public versus private hospitals.