Indices of cardiovascular function derived from peripheral pulse wave analysis using radial applanation tonometry: a measurement repeatability study

Author:

Crilly Mike1,Coch Christoph2,Bruce Margaret3,Clark Hazel3,Williams David3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen Medical School, Aberdeen, UK, mike.crilly@ abdn.ac.uk

2. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Bonn University Hospital, Bonn, Germany

3. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK

Abstract

Pulse wave analysis (PWA) using applanation tonometry is a non-invasive technique for assessing cardiovascular function. It produces three important indices: ejection duration index (ED%), augmentation index adjusted for heart rate (AIX@75), and subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR%). The aim of this study was to assess within- and between-observer repeatability of these measurements. After resting supine for 15 minutes, 20 ambulant patients (16 male) in sinus rhythm underwent four PWA measurements on a single occasion. Two nurses (A & B) independently and alternately undertook PWA measurements using the same equipment (Omron HEM-757; SphygmoCor with Millar hand-held tonometer) blind to the other nurse's PWA measurements. Within- and between-observer differences were analysed using the Bland-Altman `limits of agreement' approach (mean difference ± 2 standard deviations, 2SD). Mean age was 56 (blood pressure, BP 136/79; pulse rate 64). BP/PWA measurements remained stable during assessment. Based on the average of two PWA measurements the mean ± 2SD between-observer difference in ED% was 0.3 ± 2.0; AIX@75 1.0 ± 3.9; and SEVR% 1.7 ± 14.2. Based on a single PWA measurement the between-observer difference was ED% 0.3 ± 3.3; AIX@75 1.7 ± 6.9; and SEVR% 0.6 ± 22.6. Within-observer differences for nurse-A were ED% 0.0 ± 5.4; AIX@75 1.5 ± 7.0; and SEVR% 1.7 ± 39.0 (nurse-B: 0.1 ± 3.8; 0.1 ± 8.0; and 0.6 ± 23.3, respectively). PWA demonstrates high levels of repeatability even when used by relatively inexperienced staff and has the potential to be included in the routine cardiovascular assessment of ambulant patients.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3