Citizen or customer? Complaints handling in the public sector

Author:

Brewer Brian1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public and Social Administration, City University of Hong Kong

Abstract

Ensuring that public service complaints are handled effectively and rights of redress upheld is an integral feature of good governance and effective service delivery. A review of the academic literature and a number of key government reports reveals what citizen complaint and redress systems exist currently, how they can be designed and enabled to operate with the greatest positive impact, and why they are important in holding public officials accountable for the use of discretionary decision-making authority. With the development of new public management (NPM) and public sector reforms in many jurisdictions, a consumerist model for handling complaints has come increasingly to the fore. When combined with the traditional citizenship perspective, this would appear to have considerable potential for improving complaints handling and redress. However, the consumerist model's narrow focus on customer satisfaction and the risk of weakening citizenship values such as fairness and social justice suggest a cautious approach may be best. Public sector managers and professionals need an awareness of how public reform strategies oriented exclusively towards a strengthened consumer role do risk undermining important aspects of the complaints handling and redress strategies embedded in the `rule of law' and `due process' features of citizen-oriented public administration. Accountability may be weakened when service recipients are defined less in terms of their citizenship and more on the basis of a narrowly defined status as a marketplace consumer. This is a key implication of current trends by governments to rely increasingly on privatization, contracting-out and public—private partnerships to deliver services. Points for practitioners How well service complaints are handled is a key determinant of quality in the public services at both systemic and service-recipient levels. Procedures that are easily accessible, simple to invoke and operate, transparent, ensure stakeholders are kept informed, and sensitive to different social groups help build confidence in complaints handling and redress processes. However, as more public services are delivered by quasi-public and private organizations using contracting and subcontracting arrangements, the challenge facing practitioners is how to ensure that citizen-centric values are maintained even as external review agencies like the Ombudsman and traditional accountability promoting procedures are replaced by narrower consumerist-oriented approaches.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference31 articles.

1. Citizens and Consumers

2. Responsible, Representative and Accountable Government

3. Bovins, M. (2005) `Public Accountability', in Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. Jr and Pollitt, C. (eds) The Handbook of Public Management, pp. 182—208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. The Rhetoric of Reform and Political Reality in the National Performance Review

Cited by 64 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Benchmark for Public Ombudsman Portals of the State Courts of Accounts in Brazil;Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research;2024-06-11

2. Administrative Justice in the Modern Mixed Administrative State: Moving Beyond Taxonomies;Oxford Journal of Legal Studies;2024

3. Feedback as a Form of User Involvement in the Digital Realm;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2024

4. Challenges in promoting accountability and feedback mechanisms through customer complaints in the South African public service;International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478);2023-12-25

5. In search of the silver‐lining: Police officers' attributions and responses to stakeholder critique;Public Administration Review;2023-10-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3