The effect of information on oversight: the European Parliament’s response to increasing information on comitology decision-making

Author:

Brandsma Gijs Jan1

Affiliation:

1. Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Abstract

The European Parliament, like any parliament, needs information for scrutinizing executive decision-making. But how does it process this information in practice? This article focuses on the European Parliament’s increasing grip on ‘comitology’ decision-making: committees composed of national civil servants, producing executive measures that are adopted by the European Commission. Two types of changes are addressed: organizational changes and changes in working methods of EP staff. The analysis shows that the European Parliament has effectively built up a system of decentralized police-patrol oversight, but not following more information rights as such but rather as a result of its increasing political powers. The article concludes that information only affects the behaviour of the European Parliament in combination with very specific as opposed to quite general or diffuse political rights. Points for practitioners This article traces the effects of information on the functioning of the European Parliament as an accountability forum. It concludes that information only makes a difference when coupled with very specific as opposed to very general or diffuse political rights.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Transparency in public administrations: a structured literature review;Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management;2023-06-27

2. Sentetik Tohum;Frontiers in Life Sciences and Related Technologies;2021-08-07

3. Synthetic seeds and their role in agriculture: status and progress in sub-Saharan Africa;Plant Science Today;2021-07-01

4. Legislative Control over Executive Law‐making: Delegation of Quasi‐legislative Powers to the European Commission;JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;2019-08-28

5. Opening up by closing off: how increased transparency triggers informalisation in EU decision-making;Journal of European Public Policy;2019-04-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3