Four ideal-type organizational responses to New Public Management reforms and some consequences

Author:

Hernes Tor1

Affiliation:

1. Norwegian School of Management BI, Oslo, Oslo University College

Abstract

With its dual focus on service and accountability, New Public Management (NPM) accentuates the inherent tension between the logics of service and accountability respectively in local public administration. The present article explores, from an organization theory perspective, possible organizational responses to tensions created by the introduction of NPM. The article identifies four possible ideal-type organizational responses to NPM. First, paralysis, whereby unresolved conflict leads to a stand-off situation between management and staff. Second, ritualistic decoupling, in the sense of decoupling between espoused and enacted practices. Third, loose coupling between functions and individuals. Fourth, organic adaptation, whereby the tension is handled constructively through internal structural and cultural differentiation. Possible causes and consequences of each of these responses for management are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Public administration in authoritarian regimes;Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration;2023-01-02

2. Response of local academia to the internationalization of research policies in a non-Anglophone country;Education Policy Analysis Archives;2022-04-26

3. Alternative Recruitment Strategies;Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance;2022

4. Understanding the impact of mandatory accrual accounting on management practices: interpretation of Japanese local governments’ behavior;International Review of Administrative Sciences;2021-09-20

5. Reverse decoupling: Ukrainian case of healthcare financing system reform;International Journal of Public Sector Management;2020-04-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3