Cutback management literature in the 1970s and 1980s: taking stock

Abstract

The main purpose of this article is to take stock of the literature on public sector cutback management in the 1970s and the 1980s, with a specific focus on cutback strategies and the contents of cutbacks. Both theoretical and empirical studies, focusing either on the central or local government level or different policy fields, have been reviewed. The study shows that when governments face cutbacks, they need to address the fundamental choice between across-the-board and targeted cutback strategies. Cutbacks do not occur as one-off single actions but are usually carried out in a number of cutback rounds. The longer-lasting and the more severe is fiscal stress, the more likely it is that the governments will start imposing targeted cuts rather than implementing across-the-board strategies. Looking at the patterns of cutback management in the past is expected to provide useful insights for systematizing the approaches to cutback management and for researching the current crisis. Points for practitioners This article provides an overview of cutback management practices in the 1970s and the 1980s with the expectation that it will contribute to addressing the current fiscal crisis. The pros and cons of targeted versus across-the-board cutback strategies are discussed. The article also looks at various cutback measures including operational cuts (hiring freeze, pay freeze, lay-offs), programme and capital cuts. The study shows that the longer-lasting and the more severe the fiscal stress, the more likely it is that the governments will begin to impose targeted rather than across-the-board cuts. It is found that personnel costs are cut rather reluctantly, and hiring freeze is a dominant measure compared to salary cuts or lay-offs.