Affiliation:
1. School of Textiles, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27650, U.S.A.
Abstract
Two laboratory methods used to evaluate the ability of fabrics to provide protective insulation against high intensity thermal exposures are compared. These procedures are ASTM D4108-82, a method that uses a single laboratory gas burner as the heat source, and a more versatile method that combines two gas burners and quartz heaters to provide a different mixture of radiant and convective heat. Comparisons are based on a series of tests made on a large group of specialized fabrics that might be used in the construction of protective apparel. Among the fabrics tested are samples made with flame resistant cotton, rayon, and wool, fabrics from glass and ceramic fibers, and fabrics from polyaramids, cross-linked phenolics, modacrylics, polybenzimidazole, and stabilized acrylic fibers. Differences in materials comparisons caused by the test procedure are discussed, especially the difference made by the balance of radiant to convective energy provided by the heat sources. Correlations are made with fiber and fabric properties. Special emphasis is placed on observing the performance of alu minized samples.
Subject
Polymers and Plastics,Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference17 articles.
1. Backer, S., Tesoro, G.C., Toong, T.Y., and Moussa, N.A. "Textile Fabric Flammability," MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1976, pp. 124-127.
2. Product Engineering of Safety Apparel Fabrics: Insulation Characteristics of Fire-Retardant Cottons
3. Thermal Protective Performance test for clothing
4. Comparison of thermal characteristics of materials examined by thermogravimetry and flammability tests
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献